Scrum Artifacts¶
Scrum has three artifacts, and each carries one commitment that makes it measurable. Without the commitment, the artifact is just a list.
| Artifact | Commitment | Owned by |
|---|---|---|
| Product Backlog | Product Goal | Product Owner |
| Sprint Backlog | Sprint Goal | Developers |
| Increment | Definition of Done | Developers |
Artifacts and their commitments¶
graph LR
PG[Product Goal] -. commitment .- PB[Product Backlog]
SG[Sprint Goal] -. commitment .- SB[Sprint Backlog]
DOD[Definition of Done] -. commitment .- INC[Increment]
PB -->|Sprint Planning| SB
SB -->|work during the Sprint| INC
INC -->|Sprint Review| PB
Product Backlog¶
The single, ordered list of everything that might be needed in the product. Key properties:
- Ordered, not prioritized into buckets. There is exactly one next item.
- Emergent. It changes as the product and market are understood.
- Refined continuously. Items near the top are small and clear, items further down can stay vague. This is the classic "iceberg" shape.
Items are usually written as user stories, though Scrum does not require any particular format.
The Product Goal is the long-term objective the backlog is working toward, a target the team can aim several Sprints at.
Sprint Backlog¶
The Sprint Goal, plus the items chosen for the Sprint, plus the plan for delivering them. It belongs entirely to the Developers, who update it daily as they learn.
It is not a contract with stakeholders. It is the Developers' own working plan, and scope inside it is expected to be renegotiated with the Product Owner as reality lands.
Increment¶
A concrete step toward the Product Goal. Multiple Increments can be created in one Sprint, and an Increment is usable the moment it meets the Definition of Done. Work that does not meet it is not part of the Increment, is not shown at the Review, and is not counted as done.
Transparency and its failures¶
| Failure | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Backlog nobody has refined | Sprint Planning becomes a discovery session and runs long |
| Sprint Backlog kept in someone's head | The team cannot self-manage against it |
| "Done except for testing" | Undone work accumulates as invisible debt, and forecasts stop meaning anything |
| Two competing backlogs from two stakeholders | The team, not the Product Owner, ends up deciding priority |
Check Your Understanding¶
Why is the Product Backlog ordered rather than grouped into priority buckets?
Work is finished but untested at the end of the Sprint. Is it part of the Increment?